Shadow Traffic Network v. Superior Court

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that trial court “did not abuse its discretion” in disqualifying entire law firm from representing a defendant in a civil action
• applying rebuttable presumption involving a 4 nonemployee expert previously interviewed by opposing counsel and exposed to other 5 side’s confidential information
• finding disqualification appropriate where law firm learned information that was covered by the attorney-client privilege from an expert interviewed by 27 opposing counsel in advance of litigation
• presumption not rebutted 19 despite declaration that attorney never inquired of the expert about what was discussed in 20 confidential meeting with opposing counsel

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).