Skip to main content
· 10/20/2016

Shaderock v. Astrue

Citations

  • 220 F. Supp. 3d 47
  • 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 145361

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reasoning that continued disparity between husband’s and wife’s resources throughout marriage does not, in itself, support conclusion that terms of prenuptial agreement were substantively unconscionable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judge James E. Boasberg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.