Skip to main content
· 10/29/1998

Shackelford v. Arkansas Power & Light Co.

Citations

  • 976 S.W.2d 950
  • 334 Ark. 634
  • 1998 Ark. LEXIS 572

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that, even if an amended complaint did not name defendants in the caption, the claim against them remained until the trial court entered an order of dismissal
  • holding that an order granting summary judgment to the defendant was not a final, appealable order because an order of dismissal had not been entered for the appellant’s claims against the John Doe defendants.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Imber

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.