· 10/29/1998
Shackelford v. Arkansas Power & Light Co.
Citations
- 976 S.W.2d 950
- 334 Ark. 634
- 1998 Ark. LEXIS 572
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that, even if an amended complaint did not name defendants in the caption, the claim against them remained until the trial court entered an order of dismissal
- holding that an order granting summary judgment to the defendant was not a final, appealable order because an order of dismissal had not been entered for the appellant’s claims against the John Doe defendants.
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Imber
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.