SHACHTER v. City of Chicago

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the City’s weed control ordinance serves “a legitimate interest in aesthetics”
• “[Plaintiffs conduct — his alleged failure to control weeds on his property ... [does] not implicate any first amendment rights.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).