Shabat v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of the Rochester Area

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “an employee’s subjective belief that he suffered an adverse employment action as a result of discrimination, without more, is not enough to survive a summary judgment motion” (quoting Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass’n, 65 F.3d 452, 459 (5th Cir. 1995)
• finding no adverse employment action where discipline was not accompanied by negative consequence such as demotion or denial of pay
• alleged discipline of plaintiff consisting of being “written up,” which apparently meant that negative report was placed in his personnel file, was “too inconsequential to support an action under Title VII”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).