S.H. ex rel. R.H. v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiffs could not frame claim against state on the basis of negligent hiring, retention and supervision in order to avoid dismissal pursuant to section 63-30-10(2)
• holding that plaintiffs could not frame claim against state on the basis of negligent hiring, retention and supervision in order to avoid dismissal pursuant to section 63-30-10(2)
• explaining that the Act focuses on the conduct or situation out of which the injury arose, not on the status of the party inflicting the injury
• explaining that the Act focuses on the conduct or situa tion out of which the injury arose, not on the status of the party inflicting the injury
• State immune where cab driver under state contract sexually molested deaf child
• assault by non-employee cab driver

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Taylor Ex Rel. Taylor v. Ogden City School District
  Utah Supreme Court· 1996-11-15· cited 35×
• Tiede v. State
  Utah Supreme Court· 1996-04-17· cited 28×
• Sanders v. Leavitt
  Utah Supreme Court· 2001-08-31· cited 13×
• Clark v. Pangan
  Utah Supreme Court· 2000-04-07· cited 11×
• Wright v. University of Utah
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 1994-05-06· cited 10×
• Malcolm v. State
  Utah Supreme Court· 1994-03-24· cited 9×
• SH BY AND THROUGH RH v. State
  Utah Supreme Court· 1993-12-23

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Higgins v. Salt Lake County
  Utah Supreme Court· 1993-05-14· cited 182×
• Birkner v. Salt Lake County
  Utah Supreme Court· 1989-03-22· cited 107×
• Ledfors v. Emery County School District
  Utah Supreme Court· 1993-03-19· cited 78×
• Hodges v. Gibson Products Co.
  Utah Supreme Court· 1991-04-03· cited 66×