Sgro v. Danone Waters of North America, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “a 6 defendant can’t be liable [under 29 U.S.C. § 1132(c)(1)]” for failing to disclose information upon 7 request of the participant or beneficiary “unless it received a request”
• holding that “a 6 defendant can’t be liable [under 29 U.S.C. § 1132(c)(1)]” for failing to disclose information upon 7 request of the participant or beneficiary “unless it received a request”
• finding plan was governed by ERISA absent allegation that employer made no contribution to plan
• declining to assume that benefits plan was implemented according to its terms
• affirming 22 dismissal where plaintiff had not alleged fact necessary to ERISA exception
• refusing to interpret incorporated disability plan 19 documents to contradict plaintiff’s pleaded facts

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).