Skip to main content
· 12/16/2014

SFS Check, LLC v. First Bank of Delaware

Citations

  • 774 F.3d 351
  • 2014 FED App. 0293P
  • 85 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 401
  • 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 23681
  • 2014 WL 7139566

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that the defendant’s two phone calls with the plaintiff did not constitute purposeful availment
  • noting that leave to amend a pleading under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(2) may be denied when amendment would be futile
  • affirming district court’s denial of leave to amend complaint and granting motion to dismiss when plaintiff failed to state a claim of fraud with particularity
  • \The almost-universal law in this country is that banks owe a duty of care only to their own customers.\
  • \The almost-universal law in this country is that banks owe a duty of care only to their own customers.\ (citations omitted)
  • “The almost-universal law in this country is that banks owe a duty of care only to their own customers.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Siler, Sutton, McKeague

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.