· 12/16/2014
SFS Check, LLC v. First Bank of Delaware
Citations
- 774 F.3d 351
- 2014 FED App. 0293P
- 85 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 401
- 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 23681
- 2014 WL 7139566
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that the defendant’s two phone calls with the plaintiff did not constitute purposeful availment
- noting that leave to amend a pleading under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(2) may be denied when amendment would be futile
- affirming district court’s denial of leave to amend complaint and granting motion to dismiss when plaintiff failed to state a claim of fraud with particularity
- \The almost-universal law in this country is that banks owe a duty of care only to their own customers.\
- \The almost-universal law in this country is that banks owe a duty of care only to their own customers.\ (citations omitted)
- “The almost-universal law in this country is that banks owe a duty of care only to their own customers.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Siler, Sutton, McKeague
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.