Skip to main content
· 12/18/1984

Seymour M. Chase v. Pan-Pacific Broadcasting, Inc. Miko Enterprises, Inc.

Citations

  • 750 F.2d 131
  • 242 U.S. App. D.C. 283
  • 40 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 1107
  • 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 15836

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • party who has made no pre-answer motion may assert defense of lack of jurisdiction over the person in his answer, along with other defenses such as denials, affirmative defenses and counterclaims
  • “It was a central purpose of Rule 12(b) to do away with the necessity for a ‘special appearance’ by a defendant who sought to present a personal jurisdiction challenge.”
  • distinguishing North Branch Products, supra

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ginsburg, Bork, Starr

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.