· 12/18/1984
Seymour M. Chase v. Pan-Pacific Broadcasting, Inc. Miko Enterprises, Inc.
Citations
- 750 F.2d 131
- 242 U.S. App. D.C. 283
- 40 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 1107
- 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 15836
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- party who has made no pre-answer motion may assert defense of lack of jurisdiction over the person in his answer, along with other defenses such as denials, affirmative defenses and counterclaims
- “It was a central purpose of Rule 12(b) to do away with the necessity for a ‘special appearance’ by a defendant who sought to present a personal jurisdiction challenge.”
- distinguishing North Branch Products, supra
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ginsburg, Bork, Starr
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.