Skip to main content

Sexton v. Sexton

Citations

  • 125 S.W.3d 258
  • 2004 Ky. LEXIS 8
  • 2004 WL 102443

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting questions of donative intent can be resolved based on testimony and other facts and circumstances and stating: “The determination of whether a gift was jointly or individually made is a factual issue, and therefore, subject to the CR 52.01’s clearly erroneous standard of review.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Opinion Keller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.