Skip to main content
· 8/15/1988

Sexton v. Petz

Citations

  • 428 N.W.2d 715
  • 170 Mich. App. 561

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding negligence and gross negligence claims were merely restatements of plaintiff’s malpractice action and hence summary judgment was proper
  • holding negligence and gross negligence claims were merely restatements of plaintiff's malpractice action and hence summary judgment was proper

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McDonald, Kelly

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.