Sewerage & Water Board v. Thelen
Citations
- 117 La. 923
- 42 So. 426
- 1906 La. LEXIS 789
Syllabus
<p>Appeal — Jurisdictional Amount — Cumulation op Claims.</p> <p>Where, by reason 'of the acceptance of a portion thereof, a fund deposited in court for distribution is reduced below $2,000, and no single claim is left, whether against such fund or against either of the litigants, amounting to that sum, this court is without jurisdiction of tho appeal, and the independent claims of the litigants, each for less than $2,000, cannot be cumulated, with the effect of conferring such jurisdiction.</p> <p>[Ed. Note. — For cases in point, see Cent. Dig. vol. 2, Appeal and Error, §§ 276-292.]</p> <p>(Syllabus by the Court.)</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that Henry Schein, Inc. v. Archer & White Sales, Inc. does not prohibit the court from examining whether parties formed an agreement to arbitrate at all
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Monroe
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.