New Mexico Court of Appeals· 6/14/1984
Sewell v. Wilson
Citations
- 684 P.2d 1151
- 101 N.M. 486
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that hearsay opinion letter of non-testifying expert was improperly admitted through testimony of expert because it was “opinion”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Alarid, Hendley, Wood
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. LundstromArizona Supreme Court· 1989-07-18· cited 63×
- State v. AragonNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2010-02-12· cited 60×
- Davila Ex Rel. Taylor v. BodelsonNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1985-07-02· cited 36×
- Carraro v. Wells Fargo Mortgage & EquityNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1987-09-22· cited 36×
- Baxter v. GannawayNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1991-10-24· cited 34×
- State v. JaramilloNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2011-11-23· cited 15×
- Baerwald v. FloresNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1996-11-22· cited 13×
- Kloetzli v. KalmbacherCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1985-12-13· cited 7×
- State v. YazzieNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1993-08-12· cited 5×
- State v. JaramilloNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2012-02-16· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.