Skip to main content
· 7/1/1849

Sewall v. Tarbox

Citations

  • 30 Me. 27

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • remanding for further proceedings where obligor conceded arrearage existed but “merely disagreed about the amount” owed
  • remanding for further proceedings where obligor conceded arrearage existed but “merely disagreed about the amount” owed
  • setting aside trial court’s determination of zero arrearages where no evidence supported the finding
  • setting aside trial court’s determination of zero arrearages where no evidence supported the finding
  • motion for new trial is not a prerequisite to an appellate complaint about legal sufficiency of evidence
  • discussing Tex. R. App. P. 33.1(d)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Orally, Wells

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.