· 7/1/1849
Sewall v. Tarbox
Citations
- 30 Me. 27
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- remanding for further proceedings where obligor conceded arrearage existed but “merely disagreed about the amount” owed
- remanding for further proceedings where obligor conceded arrearage existed but “merely disagreed about the amount” owed
- setting aside trial court’s determination of zero arrearages where no evidence supported the finding
- setting aside trial court’s determination of zero arrearages where no evidence supported the finding
- motion for new trial is not a prerequisite to an appellate complaint about legal sufficiency of evidence
- discussing Tex. R. App. P. 33.1(d)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Orally, Wells
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.