· 6/23/1992
Sevin v. Kelshaw
Citations
- 611 A.2d 1232
- 417 Pa. Super. 1
- 1992 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1611
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- pleadings must not only apprise the opposing party of the claim being asserted, but must also summarize the essential facts to support the claim
- a cause of action for fraud must aver that the defendant intended to induce the plaintiff to act
- mere silence is not sufficient to prove fraud absent a duty to speak
- “Mere silence in the absence of a duty to speak ... cannot suffice to prove fraudulent concealment.”
- “[A]ctive concealment of defects known to be material to the purchaser is legally equivalent to an affirmative misrepresentation.”
- “Allegations of fraud require pleading with particularity.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kelly, Elliott, Cercone
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.