Skip to main content
· 6/23/1992

Sevin v. Kelshaw

Citations

  • 611 A.2d 1232
  • 417 Pa. Super. 1
  • 1992 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1611

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • pleadings must not only apprise the opposing party of the claim being asserted, but must also summarize the essential facts to support the claim
  • a cause of action for fraud must aver that the defendant intended to induce the plaintiff to act
  • mere silence is not sufficient to prove fraud absent a duty to speak
  • “Mere silence in the absence of a duty to speak ... cannot suffice to prove fraudulent concealment.”
  • “[A]ctive concealment of defects known to be material to the purchaser is legally equivalent to an affirmative misrepresentation.”
  • “Allegations of fraud require pleading with particularity.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kelly, Elliott, Cercone

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.