California Court of Appeal· 10/10/1985
Severtson v. Williams Construction Co.
Citations
- 173 Cal. App. 3d 86
- 220 Cal. Rptr. 400
- 1985 Cal. App. LEXIS 2609
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting, “The miscalculation, to be evident, must appear on the face of the award . . . or be so readily apparent from the documentation in the case that explanation by proofs is not necessary”
- “When the arbitrator provides the basis for decision in the form of an opinion or letter, that document becomes part of the award for purposes of review.”
- in a claim concerning a construction contract breach where the parties agreed to submit to arbitration, the court held that the use of the term \suit\ in an attorney's fee provision was broad enough to embrace the arbitration thereby justifying an award of attorney's fees and costs
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Canter
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Moncharsh v. Heily & BlaseCalifornia Supreme Court· 1992-07-30· cited 753×
- Bucur v. AhmadCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2016-01-26· cited 75×
- Heimlich v. ShivjiCalifornia Supreme Court· 2019-05-30· cited 66×
- Cooper v. Lavely & Singer Professional Corp.California Court of Appeal· 2014-09-26· cited 53×
- Jones v. Summit Limited Partnership FiveNebraska Supreme Court· 2001-11-09· cited 52×
- DiMarco v. ChaneyCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1995-01-30· cited 38×
- Paramount Unified School District v. Teachers Ass'n of Paramount, CTA/NEACalifornia Court of Appeal· 1994-07-21· cited 34×
- Maaso v. SignerCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2012-02-07· cited 29×
- Elliott & Ten Eyck Partnership v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1997-08-29· cited 27×
- Woolsey v. WoolseyCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2013-10-22· cited 26×
- Harris v. SandroCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2002-03-21· cited 24×
- Elden v. Superior Court of L.A. Cty.California Court of Appeal· 1997-03-28· cited 23×
- Century City Med. Plaza v. Sperling, Isaacs & EisenbergCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2001-01-30· cited 21×
- Furlough v. Transamerica Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal· 1988-07-26· cited 15×
- Jordan-Lyon Productions, Ltd. v. Cineplex Odeon Corp.California Court of Appeal· 1994-11-02· cited 15×
- Lopes v. MillsapCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1992-06-04· cited 15×
- Thompson v. JespersenCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1990-08-02· cited 14×
- Pierson v. HondaCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1987-09-22· cited 8×
- Heimlich v. ShivjiCalifornia Court of Appeals, 5th District· 2017-05-31· cited 4×
- Furlough v. Transamerica InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1988-07-26· cited 1×
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Reynolds Metals Co. v. AlpersonCalifornia Supreme Court· 1979-08-31· cited 393×
- Sapp v. BarenfeldCalifornia Supreme Court· 1949-12-06· cited 130×
- Morris v. ZuckermanCalifornia Supreme Court· 1968-11-26· cited 70×
- DeMello v. SouzaCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1973-12-18· cited 41×
- Lehto v. Underground Constr. Co.California Court of Appeal· 1977-05-20· cited 40×
- Jones v. KvistadCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1971-09-03· cited 36×
- Trollope v. JeffriesCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1976-02-26· cited 35×
- Banks v. Milwaukee Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal· 1966-12-07· cited 34×
- Santa Clara-San Benito Chapter of the National Electrical Contractors' Ass'n v. Local Union No. 332California Court of Appeal· 1974-07-03· cited 32×
- Lindholm v. GalvinCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1979-07-26· cited 23×
- Taranow v. BroksteinCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1982-09-13· cited 21×
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. GuleserianCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1972-10-30· cited 17×
- Durand v. Wilshire InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1969-02-24· cited 16×
- William B. Logan & Associates v. Monogram Precision Industries, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 1960-08-22· cited 13×
- Dickinson v. Kaiser Foundation HospitalsCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1980-11-10· cited 11×
- In re the Arbitration between First National Oil Corp. & ArrietaNew York Supreme Court· 1956-03-16· cited 11×
- Cecil v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1956-06-14· cited 8×
- Shammas v. National Telefilm Associates, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 1970-10-07· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.