Skip to main content
· 10/10/1985

Severtson v. Williams Construction Co.

Citations

  • 173 Cal. App. 3d 86
  • 220 Cal. Rptr. 400
  • 1985 Cal. App. LEXIS 2609

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting, “The miscalculation, to be evident, must appear on the face of the award . . . or be so readily apparent from the documentation in the case that explanation by proofs is not necessary”
  • “When the arbitrator provides the basis for decision in the form of an opinion or letter, that document becomes part of the award for purposes of review.”
  • in a claim concerning a construction contract breach where the parties agreed to submit to arbitration, the court held that the use of the term \suit\ in an attorney's fee provision was broad enough to embrace the arbitration thereby justifying an award of attorney's fees and costs

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Canter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.