Texas Supreme Court· 3/30/2012
Severance v. Patterson
Citations
- 370 S.W.3d 705
- 55 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 501
- 2012 WL 1059341
- 2012 Tex. LEXIS 260
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- observing that State could have, but did not, reserve right of public to use beachfront property when issuing land patent to private individuals
- stating that private property rights are “fundamental, natural, inherent, inalienable, not derived from the legislature” (quoting Eggemeyer v. Eggemeyer, 544 S.W.2d 137, 140 (Tex. 1977))
- “An easement does not divest a property owner of title, but allows another to use the property for [a specific] purpose.”
- “An easement does not divest a property owner of title, but allows another to use the property for [a specific] purpose.”
- “[T]he right to exclude others from privately owned realty is among the most valuable and fundamental of rights possessed by private property owners.”
- stated existence of easement in general terms implies a grant of unlimited reasonable use such as is reasonably necessary and convenient and as little burdensome as possible to the servient owner
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Green, Guzman, Hecht, Jefferson, Johnson, Lehrmann, Medina, Wainwright, Willett
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
64 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Lightning Oil Co. v. Anadarko E&P Onshore, LLCTexas Supreme Court· 2017-05-19· cited 241×
- Hearts Bluff Game Ranch, Inc. v. StateTexas Supreme Court· 2012-08-31· cited 187×
- Environmental Processing Systems, L.C. v. Fpl Farming Ltd.Texas Supreme Court· 2015-02-06· cited 58×
- Keith Redburn v. Charmelle GarrettFifth Circuit· 2018-08-01· cited 44×
- in Re Sun Coast Resources, Inc.Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2018-10-04· cited 34×
- City of Houston v. CarlsonCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2012-12-04· cited 23×
- Porretto v. Texas General Land OfficeTexas Supreme Court· 2014-07-03· cited 9×
- North Texas Municipal Water District v. Jennie Ball A/K/A Jenny Tissing and Jeffrey TissingTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2015-04-30· cited 8×
- Milton v. United StatesFederal Circuit· 2022-06-02· cited 6×
- Lindemann Properties, Ltd. v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2017-06-22· cited 5×
- Union Pacific Railroad v. Utah Department of TransportationUtah Supreme Court· 2013-07-09· cited 4×
- Texas Rice Land Partners, Ltd. v. Denbury Green Pipeline-Texas, LLCTexas Supreme Court· 2012-08-17· cited 4×
- Sansotta v. Town of Nags HeadE.D. North Carolina· 2014-11-06· cited 4×
- Key Operating & Equipment, Inc. v. Will Hegar and Loree HegarTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2013-01-07· cited 3×
- Jae Kim, Fannin Food Mart, Inc., and the Real Property Known as 2111 Fannin Street v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2014-12-10· cited 2×
- Dos Republicas Coal Partnership v. David Saucedo, as Floodplain Administrator and County Judge of the Maverick County Commissioners Court, and the Maverick County Commissioners CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2015-10-08· cited 1×
- Jae Kim, Fannin Food Mart, Inc., and the Real Property Known as 2111 Fannin Street v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2014-10-09
- Unnamed caseTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2012-12-04
- Angela Mae Brannan, Individually and as Independent of the Estate of Bob Albert Brannan v. State of TexasTexas Supreme Court· 2013-01-25
- Angela Mae Brannan, Individually and as Independent of the Estate of Bob Albert Brannan v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2014-05-01
Cites
86 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court· 1978-10-02· cited 3,324×
- West Virginia State Board of Education v. BarnetteSupreme Court· 1943-06-14· cited 2,477×
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court· 1992-06-29· cited 2,333×
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court· 1922-12-11· cited 1,990×
- Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.Supreme Court· 1982-06-30· cited 1,570×
- Nollan v. California Coastal CommissionSupreme Court· 1987-06-26· cited 1,301×
- Fitzgerald v. Advanced Spine Fixation Systems, Inc.Texas Supreme Court· 1999-08-26· cited 1,058×
- Dolan v. City of TigardSupreme Court· 1994-06-24· cited 1,023×
- United States v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court· 1945-04-02· cited 900×
- Kelo v. City of New LondonSupreme Court· 2005-06-23· cited 591×
- Philadelphia Co. v. StimsonSupreme Court· 1912-03-04· cited 450×
- Eggemeyer v. EggemeyerTexas Supreme Court· 1977-07-13· cited 400×
- Schneider National Carriers, Inc. v. BatesTexas Supreme Court· 2004-10-01· cited 346×
- Bute v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1948-06-07· cited 327×
- Marcus Cable Associates, L.P. v. KrohnTexas Supreme Court· 2002-11-05· cited 315×
- Barney v. KeokukSupreme Court· 1877-04-23· cited 297×
- Westgate, Ltd. v. StateTexas Supreme Court· 1992-12-02· cited 290×
- Drye v. Eagle Rock Ranch, Inc.Texas Supreme Court· 1963-01-30· cited 282×
- Oregon Ex Rel. State Land Board v. Corvallis Sand & Gravel Co.Supreme Court· 1977-01-12· cited 238×
- Holmstrom v. LeeTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2000-08-10· cited 221×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.