Severance v. Ford Motor Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he protection of children from harm, whether moral, emotional, mental, or physical, is a valid and compelling state interest.” (citing Stanley v. Illinois, 405 U.S. 645, 652 (1972))
• “[T]he protection of children from harm, whether moral, emotional, mental, or physical is a valid and compelling state interest.” (citing Stanley v. Illinois, 405 U.S. 645, 652 (1972))
• “Clearly, the protection of children from harm, whether moral, emotional, mental, or physical, is a valid and compelling state interest.” (citing Stanley v. Illinois, 405 U.S. 645, 652 (1972))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).