Severa v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an 18 argument involving an ALJ’s alleged error in calculating job numbers was forfeited 19 because it was not raised before the agency
• holding that a claimant waived challenge to vocational expert testimony by not raising the issue before the ALJ
• emphasizing that an opinion that a claimant “can relate” 2 on a superficial basis does not suggest that he is limited to only superficial interaction
• finding that an RFC restriction to “occasional interaction with coworkers” is 17 consistent with a medical opinion that a claimant can “relate to others on a superficial work 18 basis”
• explaining that Meanel’s preservation requirements remain binding on courts within the Ninth Circuit
• explaining that Meanel’s preservation requirements remain binding on courts within the Ninth Circuit

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).