Skip to main content
· 12/26/1972

Settle v. People

Citations

  • 504 P.2d 680
  • 180 Colo. 262
  • 1972 Colo. LEXIS 689

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying the rule of discretionary control to the reading of part of the testimony of trial witnesses
  • applying the rule of discretionary control to the reading of part of the testimony of trial witnesses
  • court must use caution so jury does not give undue weight to evidence it views during deliberations
  • reversal is warranted if there is a likelihood that the submitted evidence was used in such a manner that it was given undue weight or emphasis by the jury
  • reversal is warranted if there is a likelihood that the submitted evidence was used in such a manner that it was given undue weight or emphasis by the jury
  • no abuse of discretion to permit reading of testimony of complaining witness

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pringle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.