Setterlund v. Potter

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “evidence must be admissible at trial in order to be considered on summary judgment”
• explaining how, in the summary judgment context, “the appearance of authenticity is not enough” and that “it is not sufficient for [ ] counsel merely to assert, in the memorandum of law . . . , that the documents are authentic”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).