Seto v. Willits

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Holding that discovery rule did not apply where plaintiff allegedly repressed all memory of the sexual abuse because Pennsylvania law does now allow the mental incapacity of a plaintiff to toll the period of limitations
• noting that Pennsylvania law does not allow for the tolling of a statute of limitations due to mental incapacity
• adopting the reasoning of Baily in Type 2 case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).