Sessions v. Warwick
Citations
- 46 Wash. 165
- 89 P. 482
- 1907 Wash. LEXIS 581
Syllabus
<p>Attobnev and Client — Action fob Compensation — Pleading and Proof. In an action to recover attorney’s fees by an attorney wbo had been discharged, evidence on the part of the defendant that plaintiff did not attend to the taking of certain depositions is inadmissible under an answer alleging a discharge on account of plaintiff’s improper conduct in having instigated the case, and where it did not appear that the depositions were necessary.</p> <p>Same — Discharge—Trial—Direction of Verdict. In an action by an attorney to recover on an entire contract for the payment of $1,000 for services to be rendered in another suit, the jury is properly discharged and judgment rendered for the plaintiff, where the defendant’s evidence admits the contract and the balance due, and there was no evidence of any defense to go to the jury; it appearing that the only ground alleged in the answer for discharging the plaintiff was known to the defendant before employing the plaintiff.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting the general doctrine that “where a mortgage upon real estate contains full covenants of warranty, title acquired to the mortgaged property the mortgagor after the execution of the mortgage inures to the benefit of the mortgagee”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hadley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.