· 10/31/2000
Sessions Payroll Management, Inc. v. Noble Construction Co.
Citations
- 101 Cal. Rptr. 2d 127
- 84 Cal. App. 4th 671
- 2000 D.A.R. 11
- 2000 Daily Journal DAR 11648
- 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8798
- 2000 Cal. App. LEXIS 835
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that a third-party beneficiary may enforce a contract made expressly for its benefit and has the burden of proving that the contracting parties actually promised the performance
- explaining that a third-party beneficiary may enforce a contract made expressly for its benefit and has the burden of proving that the contracting parties actually promised the performance
- denying attorney fees to intended third-party beneficiary under contract’s fee-shifting provision
- denying attorney fees to intended third-party beneficiary under contract’s fee-shifting provision
- disclaimer of creation of third party beneficiary rights precluded third party from recovering attorneys’ fees under a contract
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kitching
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.