Skip to main content
· 10/31/2000

Sessions Payroll Management, Inc. v. Noble Construction Co.

Citations

  • 101 Cal. Rptr. 2d 127
  • 84 Cal. App. 4th 671
  • 2000 D.A.R. 11
  • 2000 Daily Journal DAR 11648
  • 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8798
  • 2000 Cal. App. LEXIS 835

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that a third-party beneficiary may enforce a contract made expressly for its benefit and has the burden of proving that the contracting parties actually promised the performance
  • explaining that a third-party beneficiary may enforce a contract made expressly for its benefit and has the burden of proving that the contracting parties actually promised the performance
  • denying attorney fees to intended third-party beneficiary under contract’s fee-shifting provision
  • denying attorney fees to intended third-party beneficiary under contract’s fee-shifting provision
  • disclaimer of creation of third party beneficiary rights precluded third party from recovering attorneys’ fees under a contract

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kitching

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.