Skip to main content
· 10/7/2013

Sessa v. United States

Citations

  • 134 S. Ct. 353
  • 187 L. Ed. 2d 264
  • 82 U.S.L.W. 3191
  • 571 U.S. 946
  • 2013 WL 4479291
  • 2013 U.S. LEXIS 5236

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming dismissal of Section 301 action for breach of contract when plaintiff failed to allege “a provision purporting to obligate” the defendant to undertake the action it allegedly failed to perform
  • affirming dismissal of Section 301 action for breach of contract when plaintiff failed to allege “a provision purporting to obligate” the defendant to undertake the action it allegedly failed to perform
  • “Nowhere in its complaint does it say 8 Given the elevated standard, Plaintiffs’ failure to attribute the claimed statements to any specific Defendant (with actual detail
  • “Nowhere in its complaint does it say when and where the [defendant] made an intentional misrepresentation about its purported authority to negotiate on behalf of the retirees.”
  • “Ordinarily, if a district court grants a defendant’s 12(b)(6) motion, the court will dismiss the claim without prejudice to give parties an opportunity to fix their pleading defects.”
  • affirming dismissal with prejudice of initial complaint

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.