Skip to main content
· 7/10/1995

Serzan v. Bendick, 89-2035 (1995)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “In the case of hourly billing, unlike with a contingency fee, the total amount that the client is required to pay her lawyer is not based on the client's recovery.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: <underline>GIBNEY, J.</underline>

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.