Servimental Inc v. Challenger Brass & Copper Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding state regulations that did not authorize termination of a provider without cause created a property interest in continued participation in program entitling him to be terminated only for cause
• “The judicial model of an evidentia-ry hearing is not a steadfast constitutional requirement.” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• “An agency’s violation of its regulations is not unconstitutional unless the regulations are necessary to afford due process.”
• “An agency’s violation of its regulations is not unconstitutional unless the regulations are necessary to afford due process.”
• “The judicial model of an evidentiary hearing is not a steadfast constitutional requirement.” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• “An agency’s violation of its regulations is not unconstitutional unless the regulations are necessary to afford due process.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).