Supreme Court of Connecticut· 7/15/1997
Service Road Corp. v. Quinn
Citations
- 241 Conn. 630
- 698 A.2d 258
- 1997 Conn. LEXIS 198
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- ‘‘the ‘irreparable harm’ standard that usually governs the decision of whether to award equitable relief is inapplicable in a CUTPA case’’
- proof is not required to demon- strate that particular loss occurred but, rather, that unfair trade practice occurred and that, based on rea- sonable inference, unfair trade practice resulted in loss
- trier of fact reasonably could have inferred that deployment of video cameras facing entrances to exotic dance clubs would have adversely impacted clubs’ business so as to satisfy ascertainable loss element of CUTPA
- “[t]he absence of a requisite allegation in a complaint that would have justified the granting of a motion to strike ... is not a sufficient basis for vacating a judgment unless the pleading defect has resulted in prejudice” [internal quotation marks omitted]
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Callahan, Katz
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.