Service Employees International Union v. National Union of Healthcare Workers

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \The right to trial by jury is guaranteed in every case in which the right to a jury was secured at the time of the adoption of the Constitution in 1868.” (quoting Mims Amusement Co. v. S.C. Law Enforcement Div.
• citing, inter alia, Lingle v. Norge Div. of Magic Chef, Inc., 486 U.S. 399, 403, (1988)
• affirming a district court’s jurisdiction to issue a temporary restraining order affording various injunctive relief under Section 301
• appealable “TRO” lasted longer than three months until preliminary injunction 3 hearing, and the district court had held two-day evidentiary hearing
• “The test for 4 mootness of an appeal is whether the appellate court can give the appellant any effective relief in the event that it decides the matter on the merits in his favor.”
• “[I]n Atkinson 23 . . . the Court held that section 301(a) does not authorize a damages action against individual union 24 members when their union is liable for violating . . . a collective bargaining agreement.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).