Skip to main content
· 4/28/2006

Service Employees International Union, Local 3 Rachel Canning Velvet Hazard v. Municipality of Mt. Lebanon

Citations

  • 446 F.3d 419
  • 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 10596
  • 2006 WL 1118812

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “[w]e are not free to hear a party’s facial challenge to a . . . regulation that is wholly inapplicable to the party”
  • separately considering a union's standing to challenge each section of an allegedly unconstitutional municipality ordinance
  • separately considering a union's standing to challenge each section of an allegedly unconstitutional municipality ordinance
  • “Over-breadth doctrine effectively allows a party to challenge separate and hypothetical applications of a regulation only when an otherwise valid application of that same regulation causes the party injury-in-fact.”
  • “[The over-breadth] doctrine effectively allows a party to challenge separate and hypothetical applications of a regulation only when an otherwise valid application of that same regulation causes the party injury-in-fact.”
  • “[The first amendment overbreadth] doctrine effectively allows a party to challenge separate and hypothetical applications of a regulation only when an otherwise valid application of that same regulation causes the party injury-in-fact.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sloviter, Smith, Stapleton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.