Skip to main content
· 2/7/1992

Federal Case

Citations

  • 955 F.2d 1312
  • 92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1168
  • 92 Daily Journal DAR 1887
  • 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 1488

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting ban on inter-candidate contributions where the ban did not distinguish on the basis of the size of the donation
  • striking down fiscal year limit on campaign fund-raising because it discriminated against challengers
  • discussing provision barring expenditure of funds raised before challenged reform measure was enacted
  • \Concerns about the unintended use of contributors’ money can be met 'by means far more narrowly tailored and less burdensome than [a] restriction on direct expenditures: simply requiring that contributors be informed that their money may be used for such a purpose.' \
  • agreeing with the district court’s analysis

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.