Serrato-Soto v. Holder

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that this court had jurisdiction to review the BIA’s denial of the alien’s application for voluntary departure because it presented a question of law
• holding that where a statute requires knowing or willful use of an altered or counterfeit Social Security number, the offense in the ordinary case “involves dishonesty as an essential element”
• holding that where a statute requires knowing or willful use of an altered or counterfeit Social Security number, the offense in the ordinary case “involves dishonesty as an essential element”
• concluding that fraudulent use of a Social Security number is a CIMT
• “willfully” or “knowingly” using personal information or identification with intent “to hide a person’s true identity”
• “And in declining to follow Beltran-Tirado, we do not disturb established Sixth Circuit precedent finding crimes of fraud or dishonesty within the class of crimes involving moral turpitude.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).