Serrano-Moran v. Grau-Gaztambide

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming decision not to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over negligence claim where the “facts and witnesses” supporting the claims are different and the federal civil rights claim had nothing to do with medical care
• affirming district court’s finding that it lacked supplemental jurisdiction, because “[t]he facts and witnesses as to the two sets of claims are essentially different . . . nor does th[is] assessment change [depending on] whether the temporal proximity is little or great”
• “Whether or not the police violated plaintiff’s civil rights has nothing to do with whether the hospital and doctors conformed to the requisite standard of care.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).