Skip to main content

Citations

  • 47 A.D.3d 70
  • 846 N.Y.S.2d 138

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[T]he continuous representation doctrine does not apply here. . . . Accordingly, the malpractice claims . . . should have been dismissed as time-barred.”
  • “[T]he continuous representation doctrine does not apply here. . . . Accordingly, the malpractice claims . . . should have been dismissed as time- barred.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Malone

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.