Sergio E. Fonseca v. Sysco Food Services of Arizona, Inc., a Delaware For-Profit Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “even the declarations that do contain hearsay 14 are admissible for summary judgment purposes because they could be presented in an admissible 15 form at trial.” (cleaned up)
• “Even the declarations that do contain 15 hearsay are admissible for summary judgment purposes because they ‘could be 16 presented in an admissible form at trial.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).