· 6/20/2000
Federal Case
Citations
- 216 F.3d 837
- 47 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 221
- 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4915
- 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 14185
- 78 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 40,173
- 83 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 304
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Courts have required separate counts where multiple claims are asserted, where they arise out of separate transactions or occurrences, and where separate statements will facilitate a clear presentation.”
- “Courts have required separate counts where multiple claims are asserted, where they arise out of separate transactions or occurrences, and where separate statements will facilitate a clear presentation.”
- “Courts have required 13 separate counts where multiple claims are asserted, where they arise out of separate 14 transactions or occurrences, and where separate statements will facilitate a clear 15 presentation.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.