Sergenton v. Barnhart

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[ALJ Rothman’s] decision relied on proper considerations and was not based on legal error or unsupported by substantial evidence in the administrative record ... ”
• remanding to consider post-hearing diagnostic evidence suggesting that the claimant’s impairment was substantially more severe than previously diagnosed
• remand was warranted to consider post-hearing diagnostic evidence suggesting that the claimant's impairment was substantially more severe than previously diagnosed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).