Federal Case

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that § 1821(d) renders exhaustion mandatory for all claims seeking payment from assets of the affected institution
• suggesting that, in addition to its express grants of jurisdiction, section 1821(d) also implies the existence of jurisdiction in other circumstances
• determining that subsections of section 1821(d) other than section 1821(d)(6)(A) permit federal courts to retain jurisdiction in circumstances where a bank’s failure postdates the institution of the action
• holding that federal court retains jurisdiction in a pre-receivership claim
• observing that the FIRREA provides for the stay of judicial proceedings “to permit exhaustion of the administrative review process as it pertains to the underlying claims”
• accepting an interlocutory appeal after noting the “importance of the jurisdictional question and its unsettled nature”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).