Sereni v. Star Sportswear Manufacturing Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that employee who failed to file administrative age discrimination complaint as required by Mass.Gen.L. ch. 151B could not bring an MCRA claim
• noting that “malice” in this context refers to “a spiteful, malignant purpose, unrelated to the legitimate corporate interest”
• rejecting the plaintiff’s “belief” that “age and ethnic bias” were the controlling factors behind his termination rather than his deficient performance
• failing to file a timely complaint with the MCAD under G.L.c. 15 IB barred relief under G.L.c. 12
• rejecting the plaintiff’s “belief” that “age and ethnic bias” were the controlling factors behind his termination rather than his deficient performance
• discriminatory acts are not “inherently unknowable” so as to toll six-month limitations period for actions under G. L. c. 15IB

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).