Seremeth v. BD. OF COUNTY COM'RS FREDERICK COUNTY

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that officers and other employees of law enforcement agencies must “make reasonable modifications in policies, practices, or procedures when the modifications are necessary to avoid discrimination on the basis of disability . . .”
• instructing that “[c]laims under the ADA’s Title II and the Rehabilitation Act can be combined for analytical purposes because the analysis is substantially the same.” (citation omitted)
• holding that “the ADA applies to police interrogations”
• “Having concluded that the ADA applies to the investigation of criminal conduct, we next con- sider whether the deputies’ conduct was reasonable under the circumstances.”
• “Having concluded that the ADA applies to the investigation of criminal conduct, we next con- sider whether the deputies’ conduct was reasonable under the circumstances.”
• stating that “[c]laims under the ADA’s Title II and the Rehabilitation Act can be combined for analytical purposes because the analysis is ‘substantially the same’” (quoting Doe v. Univ. of Md. Med. Sys. Corp., 50 F.3d 1261, 1265 n.9 (4th Cir. 1995))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).