Sereda v. A.J. Richard & Sons, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that asylum state must accept probable-cause determination made by demanding state
• in extradition hearing, presumption of regularity insulates demanding state’s probable cause determination from review in asylum state
• in criminal matters, concept of full faith and credit is articulated through Extradition Clause, U.S. Const. art. IV, § 2, cl. 2
• in extradition proceedings, rendering state may rely on probable cause determination of demanding state
• inquiry in a habeas corpus challenge to extradition proceeding
• an extradition proceeding determines: (a) whether the extradition documents on their face are in order; (b) whether the petitioner has been charged with a crime in the demanding state; (c) whether the petitioner is the person named in the request for extradition; and (d

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).