Seramur v. Saudi Arabian Airlines

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that service did not comply with Section 1608(b)(2) where [Defendant’s] affidavit established that the person served was not authorized to accept service, and [Plaintiff] did not dispute or respond to the allegation
• finding that Saudi Arabian Airlines, a corporation wholly owned by, and created under the laws of, Saudia Arabia is an “agency or instrumentality of a foreign state” under the FSIA
• dismissing claims for invalid service of process under the FSIA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).