Seraji v. Perket

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding jury’s conclusion that employer was reckless in hiring driver was unsupported by substantial evidence where: (1) the driver’s employment application indicated he had left a prior position because of his driving record; (2
• “It is the reckless conduct of the employer that the [complicity] rule seeks to punish and deter.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Hoffert v. Luze
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1998-05-28· cited 16×
• Rosenberger Enterprises, Inc. v. Insurance Service Corp. of Iowa
  Court of Appeals of Iowa· 1995-10-31· cited 12×
• Pulla v. Amoco Oil Co.
  S.D. Iowa· 1994-11-09· cited 10×
• IOWA, CHICAGO & EASTERN RAILROAD v. Pay Load, Inc.
  N.D. Iowa· 2004-12-16· cited 2×
• O'Brien v. Delaware Olds, Inc.
  D. Delaware· 1993-10-06· cited 1×
• Guardian Angel v. MetaBank
  D. New Hampshire· 2011-07-14

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Meyer v. Nottger
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1976-05-19· cited 140×
• Thompson v. Bohlken
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1981-11-25· cited 93×
• Briner v. Hyslop
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1983-08-17· cited 65×
• Midwest Management Corp. v. Stephens
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1984-07-18· cited 39×
• Barnhouse v. Hawkeye State Bank
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1987-05-13· cited 22×
• Lala v. Peoples Bank & Trust Co. of Cedar Rapids
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1988-03-16· cited 20×
• Wilson N. Jones Memorial Hospital v. Davis
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1977-06-09· cited 20×