Serafin v. Serafin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The circuit court is charged with a duty to protect the interests of its ward and has, by statute and otherwise, those powers necessary to appoint a guardian ad litem to represent the interests of the respondent during the court’s exercise of its jurisdiction”
• “The circuit court is charged with a duty to protect the interests of its ward and has, by statute and otherwise, those powers necessary to appoint a guardian ad litem to represent the interests of the respondent during the court’s exercise of its jurisdiction”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Delores W.
  Illinois Supreme Court· 2008-04-03· cited 38×
• People v. Delores W.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2008-06-19· cited 16×
• J.H. v. Ada S. McKinley Community Services, Inc.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2006-12-29· cited 12×
• In re Mark W.
  Illinois Supreme Court· 2008-04-03
• In re Mark W.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2008-06-19
• In re G.J.P.
  Utah Supreme Court· 2020-02-05

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• First Capitol Mortgage Corp. v. Talandis Construction Corp.
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1976-03-29· cited 1,536×
• Wold v. Bull Valley Management Co.
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1983-04-22· cited 42×
• In Re Estate of Nelson
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1993-07-22· cited 33×
• Hufnagle v. Prior
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1983-07-25· cited 6×
• In Re Estate of Johnson
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1991-10-01· cited 5×
• County of Cook v. Kempe
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1990-09-17· cited 4×