· 5/25/2000
Sera v. State
Citations
- 17 S.W.3d 61
- 341 Ark. 415
- 2000 Ark. LEXIS 266
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that an expert's testimony that a victim's symptoms were consistent with administration of a date rape drug were admissible
- affirming the rape-shield-based exclusion of evidence because the testimony’s purpose was to cast the victim in a bad light
- affirming exclusion of evidence of little probative value that would simply “cast [the victim] in a bad light”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lavenski R. Smith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.