SER Advance Stores v. Hon. Arthur M. Recht

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reinforcing Court’s determination that it “will not answer a certified question if, in doing so, [it] would have to render a non-controlling, advisory answer”
• discussing requirement that answer to certified question be determinative of issue pending in certifying court and not advisory
• “[T]his Court will not address a certified question if it is not dispositive of a controlling issue in the case.”
• “In the final analysis, this Court will not address a certified question if it is not dispositive of a controlling issue in a case.”
• “[T]his Court will not address a certified question if it is not dispositive of a controlling issue in the case.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).