Sequoia Venture No. 2, Ltd. v. Cassidy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that persons arrested and confined in other states are not similarly situated to those arrested and confined in Connecticut, despite previous case assuming that opposite was true, but disposing of case on rationale that no fundamental right was at stake
• concluding that persons arrested and confined in other states are not similarly situated to those arrested and confined in Connecticut, despite previous case assuming that opposite was true, but disposing of case on rationale that no fundamental right was at stake
• constitutional right of equal protection \is essentially a direction that all persons similarly situated should be treated alike\ [internal quotation marks omitted]
• constitutional right of equal protection “is essentially a direction that all persons similarly situated should be treated alike” [internal quotation marks omitted]
• equal protection clause of fourteenth amendment applies only upon threshold showing that state statute or practice treats similarly situated persons differently
• equal protection clause of fourteenth amendment applies only upon threshold showing that state statute or practice treats similarly situated persons differently

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).