Skip to main content
· 5/25/2006

Seput v. Lacayo

Citations

  • 134 P.3d 733
  • 122 Nev. 499
  • 122 Nev. Adv. Rep. 45
  • 2006 Nev. LEXIS 59

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that statutes should be interpreted with related provisions to ensure a consistent and coherent legal framework

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rose, Gibbons, Hardesty

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.