· 7/21/2010
Sentinel Ridge Development, LLC v. Department of Environmental Protection
Citations
- 2 A.3d 1263
- 2010 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 387
- 2010 WL 2836723
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- the EHB’s remand for DEP to use its expertise and discretion to further investigate a proposed project’s impact calls for more than a ministerial task
- the EHB’s remand for DEP to use its expertise and discretion to further investigate a proposed project’s impact calls for more than a ministerial task
- “After [] DEP conducts its review, [the Board] will either restore the permit or revoke it.”
- where the lower tribunal’s order did not decide the merits before the remand, there is no issue capable of evading review
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McGinley, Simpson, Friedman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.