Skip to main content
· 7/21/2010

Sentinel Ridge Development, LLC v. Department of Environmental Protection

Citations

  • 2 A.3d 1263
  • 2010 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 387
  • 2010 WL 2836723

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • the EHB’s remand for DEP to use its expertise and discretion to further investigate a proposed project’s impact calls for more than a ministerial task
  • the EHB’s remand for DEP to use its expertise and discretion to further investigate a proposed project’s impact calls for more than a ministerial task
  • “After [] DEP conducts its review, [the Board] will either restore the permit or revoke it.”
  • where the lower tribunal’s order did not decide the merits before the remand, there is no issue capable of evading review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McGinley, Simpson, Friedman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.