Skip to main content
· 8/19/1996

Sentex Systems, Inc., a California Corporation v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company, a Connecticut Corporation

Citations

  • 93 F.3d 578
  • 39 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1860
  • 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6156
  • 96 Daily Journal DAR 10105
  • 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 20645
  • 1996 WL 467048

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “In this day and age, ad vertising cannot be limited to written sales materials, and the concepts of marketing includes a wide variety of direct and indirect advertising strategies.”
  • “In this case, the district court held that Sen-tex was engaged in ‘advertising activities’ and that E SSI’s alleged injuries were caused by these activities. These rulings are not challenged on appeal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hug, Schroeder, Hawkins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.